Adakah Kita Perlu Melayan Ngomelan Ultrakiasu?
Kali ini saya tidak mahu berbasa-basi.Tidak mahu meleret-leret.Straight to the point.Ok.
Kali ini kita ulas blog seorang ahli politik Ultrakiasu berfahaman Komunis yang dikenali ramai.Jika mahu berurusan dengan Ultrakiasu,apa jua kajian sejarah Malaysia mereka tentang 'ketuanan Cina' di Malaysia,itu bukanlah lesen besar mereka untuk menuntut Malaysia dari tangan orang Melayu semutlaknya.Dari 'Ketuanan UMNO' itu cerita lain.Tapi bukan dari tangan orang Melayu semutlaknya.Kena faham itu.Ada beza di situ.
Blognya kali ini 'copy-paste' daripada artikel oleh John Doe,penulis yang mempunyai gaya yang sama dengan Micheal Chick,seorang lagi penulis kegemaran DAP,parti Chauvinist-Communist Malaysia.PAS kena sedar hal ini.Kena langkah mayat si Kauvinis-Komunis ini kalau nak tegak negara Islam.Kalau nak lawan UMNO,PAS kena bercerai dari DAP.Biar DAP berjuang sorang-sorang.Biar hidup segan mati tak mahu macam dulu-dulu.Menukarkan 'Ketuanan Melayu' kepada 'Ketuanan Islam' adalah lebih mudah daripada jika DAP naik memerintah,dia akan paksakan 'Malaysian Malaysia'.Ia bermaksud "ketuanan Cina berasaskan materialisme tahap berat' macam di Singapura.Ini bukan lagi nak bincang pasal 'sekularisme' tuan-tuan dan puan-puan.Ini adalah KAUVINIS-KOMUNIS.Tuhan mereka wang.Mereka 'kafir harbi' versi baru yang tak berperang dengan pedang.Mereka berperang dengan propaganda dan pilihanraya.Tipu muslihat.
Jadi PAS kena keluar sepenuhnya dari kerjasama dengan DAP.Biar sekularisme UMNO belasah habis-habis semua komunis ini.Kemudian PAS datang dakwah pada UMNO tentang sunnah Rasulullah s.a.w.Lama-lama lembutlah hati UMNO.Melembutkan hati sekularis Melayu yang mengucap dua kalimah syahadah dan sembahyang,lebih mudah rasanya dari melembutkan kafir harbi yang pekat dengan faham Komunis dan Kauvinisnya.Apa pemimpin UMNO kata semasa nak jalankan hukum hudud?"Ala...takut nanti semua orang Malaysia tak boleh kerja pasal kudung tangan...." atau "takut-takut nanti habis batu-batu tepi jalan semua pakai nak rejam orang berzina.."
Cakap berlapik-lapik sambil tersengih-sengih.
Tapi apa DAP Komunis cakap tentang hukum hudud?
LANGKAH MAYAT SAYA DULU! (Karpal Singh)
Tegas dan keras.Ini hukum Tuhan syeikh...you masih nak berkoloborasi dengan orang yang cabar hukum Allah macam tu sekali.Nak cabar langkah mayat dahulu konon.Kita tengok,sama ada Karpal Singh mati dulu atau HUKUM ALLAH mati dulu.Bukan sahaja Anwar harus bertaubat...Karpal Singh juga harus bertaubat sama.
:D
Sejarah tidak pernah berbohong.Cara yang digunakan oleh mereka ialah membuat keraguan terhadap sejarah orang Melayu,dengan membesar-besarkan sejarah kedatangan orang Cina walaupun Cina Muslim (etnik Hui,yang kadangkala didiskriminasi oleh Komunis China) dengan motif bahawa Cina memainkan peranan yang amat besar di Malaysia disamping merendahkan-rendahkan sejarah orang Melayu.Tidak kira betapa besar pun peranan yang dimainkan,'pendatang tetap pendatang' kecuali mereka membuang sifat Cina totok mereka,keangkuhan dan yang paling penting sifat 'ULTRAKIASU' mereka iaitu 'sindrom takut dikatakan pendatang'.
Ini artikel pertama:Lim Kit Siang1
Petikan pertama:
"Read the above again very carefully !! Sultan Muhammad Shah married a Johorean-Temasik princess in 1363. Now, for all those products of Biro Tata Negara (BTN) out there, what year was Malacca formed? 1403. So, there was a Johor king already in 1363? Are you going to argue with Ketuanan Brunei on this? (By the way, he’s more Melayu than YOU!) Also for those who insist that Penang be handed over to Kedah, read the following again and again …"
Jawapan:
Siapa Biro Tatanegara?Puak UMNO bukan faham sejarah pun.Kata Ketuanan Melayu konon,tapi tender-tender bagi kat Cina pasal kontraktor Cina suap duit.Ada seorang tukang buat longkang Melayu yang cuba nak mohon tender dalam UIA.Tapi apa yang orang Melayu dalam UIA tu buat?Bukan takat bos,kerani cabuk yang cuma bagi borang pada tukang Melayu ini pun mintak 50 sen satu kaki.You all tahu betapa susahnya usahawan Melayu nak survive pasal semua atasan Melayu ni main rasuah.Buat 100 institusi macam MARA pun tak jalan syeikh...kalau biawak-biawak pasir kat jabatan-jabatan kerajaan itu semua hidup mengemis duit suap Cina.Ingat lagi tak Zul eletronik yang pakar dalam bidang inovasi elektronik itu?Punya susah dia nak mintak tapak untuk memulakan perniagaan.Encik Zul ini bukan berada di Beijing.Dia orang Melayu yang nak berniaga di negara Ketuanan Melayu!
Cubala bagi tapak berniaga macam kedai elektronik di Jalan Pasar tu.Dah tentu Encik Zul boleh tolong bantu siapkan 'final project' anak-anak Melayu sambil mengajar.All out!Jual 'spare part' elektronik.Encik Zul boleh ambil budak-budak universiti ini buat R&D.Buat produk baru...pasarkan.
Jadi beralih kepada petikan tadi,siapa nak hairan dengan seorang "a Johorean-Temasik princess in 1363".Kita ada dua hujah pemusnah:
1)Kerajaan Temasek memang ada sebelum penubuhan Melaka.Kalau puteri itu dari 'Johorean-Temasek',tiada apa yang perlu dihairankan.Tiada kaitan dengan Melaka.
2)Tahun 1403 itu dah expired.Sekarang penubuhan Melaka seawal tahun 1262 Masehi.
Pulau Pinang patut serah pada Kedah balik pasal pengunduran British bermakna wilayah-wilayah kita yang dahulunya dijajah mereka sudah JADI HAKMILIK KITA SEPENUHNYA.Segala perjanjian bodoh Sultan-sultan dahulu boleh dibakar hangus.Apa nak takut dengan British?Dia orang sudah berambus pergi.So what?
Petikan lagi:
"The Johor ruler was under the Thais. The entire Peninsular belonged to the Thais! The ‘king’ of Singapore (Temasik), whom Parameswara of the Malaccan Sultanate murdered in cold blood was in fact the brother-in-Law of the ‘King’ of Pattani, who was under Ayodthaya rule. For those who do not know, Ayodthaya is in Thailand. And that, my friend was already well established before 1363.
Next, Kota Gelanggi was also another Thai City, (yet to be publicized). And why not? Because it is a Thai Buddhist kingdom. Yes, it’s along the Johor River. All I’m allowed to say at this point is that Kota Gelanggi is REALLY along the Johor River. Expose Kota Gelanggi, and you will find its 30ft Buddha statues and its many Buddhist Temples, in all it’s glory"
Ulasan:
Pemerintah Johor dibawah Thai?Apa yang komunis ini merapu?Bila masa pulak orang Thai terhegeh-hegeh sampai ke Johor?Kalau sampai ke Kedah itu bolehlah dipercayai.Bahkan sampai di Selangor dan Kuala Lumpur pun tak pernah dengar lagi,masakan pula tiba-tiba muncul orang Thai di Johor?Pelik...
Seluruh semenanjung di bawah Thai?INI LA BODOH SEJARAH NAMANYA.Bukan buta sejarah lagi.What the hell?Owh...Temagi?Dia wakil kerajaan Tambralingga/Sri Dharmaraja,BUKAN THAI.Sri Dharmaraja adalah 'Malay city-states'.Selepas membebaskan diri dari Srivijaya,Sri Dharmaraja menguasai seluruh semenanjung sehingga ke Temasik.Sebab sekarang Sri Dharmaraja (orang barat memanggilnya sebagai Ligor) di dalam Thailand sekarang,maka sejarahnya jadi hakmilik Thailand dan orang Thai?What the pathetic of this communist?!Sejarah tetap sejarah.You tak boleh tukar-tukar macam you tukar baju.
Ayuthaya tertubuh tahun 1351,peristiwa di atas tahun 1363,dalam masa 12 tahun sahaja tiba-tiba seluruh Tanah Melayu bawah Thai?My friend...Ayuthaya kena berperang dengan Sukothai dahulu,kerajaan Angkor dan Sri Dharmaraja.Tiada dalam sejarah Thai yang mengatakan mereka pernah menakluk sampai ke Johor.Wilayah mereka sampai ke Patani sahaja,itu pun berjaya setelah beberapa kali berperang dan sepenuhnya jatuh pada tahun 1771.Kenapa Melaka boleh jadi satu kesultanan besar di dalam wilayah Thai?Kemudian bila Melaka jatuh,senang-senang kerabat Sultan buka negeri Johor pula malah jadi empayar besar.Dalam wilayah Thai tu cek...tak marah ke raja Thai,bila dalam kerajaannya boleh pula orang Melayu buat kerajaan sendiri malah jadi empayar besar pula?
Masa mula-mula Ayutthaya tertubuh,Raja U-Thong ambil masa nak bangunkan Ayutthaya yang berpaya.Rakyatnya hanya para pengikutnya yang berhijrah bersamanya dari tengah Thailand.Masa tu kerajaan Sukothai paling kuat.Sebelah timur masih ada lagi kerajaan Angkor di Kemboja.Ambil masa la apek oiii....
Kota Gelanggi bukan kota Thai.Ia milik Siam Asli.Siam Asli bermaksud penduduk asli negeri Siam iaitu Melayu dan Mon.Apa nak dihairan dengan patung Buddha,sebab sebelum kedatangan Islam,memang ada orang di sini yang menganut ajaran Buddha,malah empayar Sriwijaya itu pun pengembang ajaran Buddha Mahayana.Tok nenek moyang Lim Kit Siang pada zaman purba pun kemungkinan belajar bahasa Sanskrit dengan pendeta Melayu.Agama Buddha bukan bermakna 'Cina' macam Hindu=Tamil.Satu lagi penyakit penulis sejarah Ultrakiasu.Kalau Islam=Melayu.Buddha=Cina.Hindu=Tamil.Sebab itu penulisan sejarahnya merepek-repek.
Lagi:
"So, for Penang to go back to Kedah, ALL of the peninsula needs to go back to the Thais. Sarawak needs to go back to Brunei, Brunei needs to go back to Majapahit, Sabah needs to go back to the Philippines, and Parameswara needs to go back to Palembang, leaving the Orang Asli in charge all over again. (I find it ludicrous that the Orang Asli are disqualified as ‘Bumiputera’ although they have been here since 60,000 years ago) "
ulasan:
Patutlah berkokok pasal semenanjung dahulu bawah Thai...dia ni takut kalau Sultan Kedah tuntut Pulau Pinang serah kat Kedah.Habislah 'Singapura Kedua' in the making...
Mari analisis satu persatu...
1)Penang to go back to Kedah
Yes...memang Pulau Pinang milik Kedah.Selepas British berambus,Pulau Pinang bukan lagi milik British maka kita ada hak untuk kembalikan Pulau Pinang kepada Sultan Kedah.
2)ALL of the peninsula needs to go back to the Thais
Apa bodohnya apek ni?Orang Thai adalah imigran termuda Indochina dimana Melayu,Mon dan Khmer selain Pyu adalah etnik-etnik Indochina awal.Semua pakar sejarah tahu hal ini termasuk diakui oleh sejarahwan Thai.Itu baru INDOCHINA,apatah lagi JOHOR yang nun kat hujung tu.Indochina tak abis jejak lagi,tiba-tiba muncul orang Thai di Johor?Benak betul,kata orang kampung saya.
Thai bukan pribumi semenanjung macam Lim Kit Siang bukan pribumi semenanjung.Kalau benar Thai menjajah semenanjung...THAI LAH YANG PATUT KEMBALIKAN SELURUH SEGENTING KRA DAN SEMENANJUNG KEPADA MELAYU,Thailand Tengah kepada orang Mon dan selebihnya kepada Kemboja sebab dahulunya sebahagian wilayah-wilayah Thai sekarang di bawah Empayar Khmer.You understand?
3)Sarawak needs to go back to Brunei
Kes Sarawak dan Sabah,'special' sikit.Dalam sejarah,memang kedua-dua wilayah ini pernah di bawah Brunei TETAPI semasa undian untuk bersama Persekutuan Malaysia,rakyat di kedua-dua negeri ini majoriti mahu merdeka bersama Malaysia.So what?
TAMBAHAN PULA,dahulu tiada negara bernama Malaysia.Yang ada negeri-negeri Melayu.Brunei adalah salah satu negeri-negeri Melayu.KESIMPULANNYA SARAWAK DAN SABAH TETAP MILIK ORANG MELAYU BUKAN KOMUNIS CHIN PENG.
4)Brunei needs to go back to Majapahit
Apa benaknya apek ni?Kenapa pula Brunei nak kembali ke Majapahit?Lebih baik tulis "Brunei needs to go back to Srivijaya".Sebab Sriwijaya lebih awal dari Majapahit,juga pernah menguasai Brunei.
Satu lagi kebodohan apek ini,mana ada Majapahit kini?Yang ada Indonesia.Dahulu tiada negara nama Indonesia.Orang Brunei pun mati-mati tak mahu masuk negara Indonesia.Macam mana Brunei mahu kembali ke Majapahit.Tapi apek...you jangan lisau punyerr...ada cara.
Bawa negeri Brunei sekarang naik mesin masa ke zaman Hayam Wuruk. :P
5)Sabah needs to go back to the Philippines
Kenapa pula Sabah perlu balik ke Filipina?Mana ada Filipina dahulukala?Sedangkan Filipina pun dijajah bersilih ganti oleh Sepanyol dan Amerika,mana sempat buat empayar takluk Sabah.Kebodohan apa yang cuba ditampilkan apek ini?
Presiden Macapagal tuntut Sabah atas kapasiti sejarah Kesultanan Sulu.Ini baru betul.Tapi Macapagal pun salah.Kesultanan Sulu hanya berkuasa di Jolo dan sekitarnya sahaja.Sabah di bawah Kesultanan Sulu hanya khayalan,sebab ada Kesultanan Melayu lebih hebat dari Sulu,yang ada autoriti ke atas Sabah.Siapa?Kesultanan Brunei.
6)Parameswara needs to go back to Palembang, leaving the Orang Asli in charge all over again
Sampai tahap ini,tak payah menjawab dengan panjang lebar...you just say..
'Lim Kit Siang and John Doe needs to go back to China, leaving the Orang Melayu & Orang Asli in charge all over again'
Best tak ayat ni? ;D
Kita petik lagi:
"Next, the year 1363 is of great significance. Why? That was the year that the first Sultan of Brunei converted to Islam. And he immediately became the Ruler of Brunei? What was he before that? A fisherman? A carpenter? A farmer? What was Awang Alak Betatar in 1362? And what happened the following year when he became a Sultan? Is becoming a Muslim enough to justify becoming a Sultan? Was he the first person in Brunei to convert to Islam?
Let’s scroll back time by 100 years; the year is now 1264. A full hundred years BEFORE Awang Alak Betatar converted to Islam, and declared himself a Sultan. A trip to Bandar Seri Begawan is not complete unless one visits the Muslim graves at Rangas. Chuck your ‘pantang’ out the window if you want to enjoy this first-hand, and in real life. Amongst these tombstones is the one of a Chinese Muslim by the name of Pu Kung Chih-mu. He was buried there in 1264. He was a Muslim, buried in a Muslim grave! This is more than a hundred years earlier, before the ascension of Awang Alak Betatar as the ‘first’ Sultan of Brunei. Not only that, he is not the only Chinese Muslim there. I cross-checked against the Brunei Museum Journal of 1993, and found that this has been so well documented!! In fact, this grave had already been found since 1973. Whole communities of Chinese Muslims had already been living in Kampong Batu well before the 12th Century. It is clearly recorded in the 1973 Brunei Museum Journal, and was visited by professors from Japan and China. Pictures are on page 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12. Some are even in colour."
Ulasan:
Siapa Pu Kung Chih-mu?Raja China yang memerintah Brunei?Sudah tentu TIDAK.Tidak perlu nak hairan ada kubur Cina Muslim di Brunei.Sebab negeri-negeri Melayu kaya dengan hasil bumi sebab itu ramai orang Cina datang ke negeri-negeri Melayu.Termasuklah Cina Islam yang datang berdakwah.Tapi YANG PUNYA AUTORITI KE ATAS NEGERI-NEGERI MELAYU ADALAH ORANG MELAYU.
Melainkan ada kubur Maharaja China dan istananya di Brunei,baru orang respek.Ini takat pedagang dan pendakwah Cina,perkara biasalah apek.
Buat-buat terkejut pula apek seorang ini.
Petikan:
"So, here’s another nugget for BTN un-educators. The Chinese brought Islam to this region in 1264. Wait! That’s not even correct. It was even earlier, because, this Muslim Chinese died in 1264. He had lived a full life in Brunei before he died. And before anyone even thinks of contesting this, let me draw your attention to yet another well-established fact, and let’s see how early the Chinese arrived.
According to records – as in the ‘Notes on the Malay Archipelago and Malacca Compiled from Chinese Sources’ by WP Groeneveldt in 1880 – a Chinese Islamic trader arrived in Brunei in the 10th century. His name was P’u-lu-shieh. He was both a trader and a diplomat. SQ Fatimi writing in the Sociological Research Institute in Singapore in 1963 under an article entitled ‘Islam Comes to Malaysia’, P’u-lu-shieh name is akin to Abu al-Layth.
The Brunei King at that time was named ‘Hiang-ta’. The arrival of the diplomat-trader from China was greeted with great ceremony. If this is so, Islam actually arrived in Brunei in the year of 977."
Ulasan:
Baguslah Islam datang awal ke negeri-negeri Melayu.Tidak kiralah siapa yang bawa,orang Arab ke Parsi ke Cina ke...tiada masalah.Orang Arab bawa Islam ke negeri-negeri Melayu,adakah bukti 'Ketuanan Arab' ke atas Melayu?Sudah tentu tidak.Jadi saya tidak faham kenapa apek bodoh sejarah ini terlompat-lompat dengan orang Cina yang membawa agama Islam ke negeri Melayu.Lim Kit Siang dan John Doe ini bukan orang Islam pun...sepatutnya mereka mencontohi orang Cina yang memeluk Islam,meninggalkan agama nenek moyang yang menyembah patung-patung tak bernyawa hasil bikinan tangan sendiri.
Sebenarnya selain orang Cina Muslim,pedagang Arab juga cuba-cuba menyebarkan agama Islam.Dalam sejarah,bukan oran Cina sahaja yang berdagang dengan raja Melayu,orang Arab pun ada,Parsi pun ada.
Owh,dia nak bagitahu,orang Cina dah lama duduk Brunei.Tak patut tuduh mereka PENDATANG.Masalahnya generasi sekarang bukan generasi dahulu.Generasi sekarang yang cari sesuap nasi di sini dan Brunei adalah generasi yang lari dari kekacauan di China serta mahu mencari rezeki dengan tenang di seberang laut.Generasi dahulu sudah pupus sama ada terasimilasi dengan orang Melayu atau balik ke China.Orang Cina yang kahwin dengan kerabat Sultan Brunei itu pun,anak-anaknya diberi nama Awang dan menjadi 'Melayu'.So what?
'Hiang-ta' itu adalah nama panggilan orang Cina dalam catatan mereka,tidak boleh dijadikan bukti.Macam 'Se-li Ma-ha-la-sha' seorang raja Nusantara,sebenarnya bernama 'Seri Maharaja'.Itu slang Cina,lidah pendek susah nak sebut nama Melayu atau nama Sanskrit.Sekarang pun ramai Cina Malaysia lidah pendek cakap Melayu pun teruk pelatnya walaupun dah bertahun duduk Malaysia.
Lagi:
"If this is the year 977, and the Sultan’s name in the year 977 is Hiang-Ta, then how can Awang Alak Betatar be the ‘first’ Sultan of Brunei in 1363? For those with very bad logic (or timeline problems), the year 977 is 406 years older than 1363. And in the year 977, the Chinese were already sending Muslim ambassadors to Brunei. The real question should be, thus, who exactly was that ‘Hiang Ta’ who ruled Brunei in the year 977? An Iban? A Kadazan or a Chinese?
It gets even better. The MOST interesting thing was that the Brunei king’s delegation to China to return the emperor’s greetings was also headed by another Muslim official by the name of P’u A-li (Abu Ali).
Based on this fact alone, Abu Ali must have held an important position in the Brunei government if he was tasked to be Brunei’s ambassador in those days. This is again, irrefutable proof that there was already a government, with a King, and some members of his royal court were Muslims. Again, this is proof that Islam had already reached Brunei before the year 977. This is 75 years into the beginning of the Soong Dynasty, and only severely retarded people will say that Abu Ali was an Arab because of his name"
Ulasan:
Lepas itu nak cakap Abu Ali itu Cina?Lagilah tak logik.
Tidak kisahlah AWang Alak Betatar ke sultan pertama,Hiang-ta ke sultan pertama,YANG PASTI BUKAN CINA KOMUNIS yang pertama jadi Sultan Brunei.Yang PASTINYA ORANG MELAYU PRIBUMI BRUNEI.
Boleh tanya lagi sama ada Iban,Cina atau Kadazan si Hiang-ta itu?Antara ketiga-tiga kaum itu di Brunei,siapa yang dikenali kerana Islam dan punya Kesultanan Islam dalam sejarah Brunei???
JAWAPANNYA TIDAK ADA.
Kesemua kaum-kaum itu majoriti non-muslim.Yang ada autoriti ke atas Kesultanan Islam ialah MELAYU BRUNEI.
Lagi:
"And by the way, Malacca was not to have been discovered for another 400 years. Is there a prawn under the stone? You can bet your bottom dollar (because Ringgit is worthless toilet paper) that whenever John Doe writes, there is.
A number of European historians claimed that Brunei was still not a Muslim nation until the 15th century. However, the Ming Shih, Book 325, a Chinese reference book noted that the King of Brunei in 1370 was Ma-ho-mo-sa. Some say that this should be read as Mahmud Shah. In fact, local Brunei historians prefer to take this to refer to Muhammad Shah, the first Sultan of Brunei.
Robert Nicholl, a former Brunei Museum curator argued in another paper entitled ‘Notes on Some Controversial Issues in Brunei History’ in 1980 that the name Ma-ho-mo-sa could be pronounced as Maha Moksha which means ‘Great Eternity’. ‘Maha Mokhsa’ would make it a Buddhist name. Nicholl goes on to argue that even the Brunei Sultan who died in Nanjing in 1408 was not a Muslim. (History books always detail that the Sultan of Brunei went to China, but few will state that he died there),
Another historian Paul Pelliot said Ma-na-jo-kia-nai-nai was reconstituted as Maharajah Gyana (nai). But the closest title would have been Maharaja Karna. However Brunei historians have insisted that the King was Sultan Abdul Majid Hassan, who would have been the second Sultan of Brunei.
Nicholl further argued that Sultan Muhammad Shah converted to Islam as late as the 16th century and not during the 14th century as is widely known. However according to Brunei historians, Sultan Muhammad Shah converted to Islam in 1363 and that he ruled until 1402. After which time, it was Sultan Abdul Majid Hassan, who died in China who ascended the throne. That was when Sultan Ahmad reigned in Brunei beginning 1406.
And why did I bring up this detail? Simple !! Read the top all over again:
-Sultan Muhammad Shah married a Johorean-Temasik Princess in 1363.
-And that Kota Gelanggi and the entire peninsular Malaya belonged to the Thais. And if this is true and correct, then both the Sultan of Brunei and his wife, would have been Buddhists.
-In fact, the entire peninsular Malaya had been Buddhist and/or Hindu ever since the second century when Lembah Bujang was built. And since this is the year 1363, all of Brunei and Borneo was also under the rule of King Hayam Wuruk, who was King of the Majapahit empire. And what religion did they have? (I’ll give you a hint… they built the Borobudor. And for those who claim that Borobudor is a mosque in disguise, please learn to recognize temple architecture.)
Borrobudor in all its splendour."
Ulasan:
Lihat,Cina pendek lidah sebut 'Mahmud Syah' jadi 'Ma-ho-mo-sa'.Bukti diberi sendiri oleh penulis Komunis.
Apa halnya dengan Maha Moksha?Aha...nak tahu kenapa?Kita lihat apa propaganda apek Komunis ini seterusnya,sampai tahap ini dia mula memutarbelitkan fakta sejarah 360 darjah,dengan andaian bahawa sebenarnya Sultan-sultan Brunei itu adalah penganut Buddha!
Kita analisis satu persatu:
1)Sultan Muhammad Shah married a Johorean-Temasik Princess in 1363.
Tiada Masalah.
2)And that Kota Gelanggi and the entire peninsular Malaya belonged to the Thais. And if this is true and correct, then both the Sultan of Brunei and his wife, would have been Buddhists.
Ini masalah.Thai tak pernah jajah SELURUH SEMENANJUNG.Kalau semenanjung di bawah Thai sekalipun APA KENA MENGENA DENGAN SULTAN BRUNEI NUN JAUH KAT BORNEO ITU?Baik tulis bahawa Borneo di bawah Thai terus.Hello,apek...you tau ka Borneo kat mana?Borneo bukan cantum dengan semenanjung la.Tarak baca ka?
3)In fact, the entire peninsular Malaya had been Buddhist and/or Hindu ever since the second century when Lembah Bujang was built. And since this is the year 1363, all of Brunei and Borneo was also under the rule of King Hayam Wuruk, who was King of the Majapahit empire. And what religion did they have? (I’ll give you a hint… they built the Borobudor. And for those who claim that Borobudor is a mosque in disguise, please learn to recognize temple architecture.)
Inilah dia bukti kebodohan sejarah yang pelik.BOROBUDUR BUKAN DIBINA ZAMAN MAJAPAHIT.IA DIBINA ERA SRIVIJAYA.What a pathetic bullshit of you??
Kalau saya jadi diktator...saya pancung saja apek Komunis ni.Menyusahkan.Merepek-repek.Buang masa.
Lihat,
"...And for those who claim that Borobudor is a mosque in disguise, please learn to recognize temple architecture."
Wah...kalau dah kiasu...kiasu jugak,sampai dakwaan Megat Siam dan Anai-anai pun MENAKUTKAN CINA KOMUNIS INI.Lawak...lawak...baca juga John Doe ini blog KedahCyberSaiburi itu.
Petikan terakhir:
"Oh, and even more important is this:
“Sultan Abdul Majid Hassan whose proper name is Zein Ul-Abidin, frequented the near distant islands, that He called ‘Solook’ (Sulu) from 1402 to 1424. Marrying the daughter (Parmursuli) of the Sulu Tomaoi (chief) Baginda” – it means he had a Filipino wife.
Also important to note, that since this is 1363, Parameswara had not yet swum across Pirate-Bay to reach Temasik yet. Hence, the need to locate the earlier kingdoms which pre-date ‘His Royal Pendatangness’.
During the reign of Wikramawardhana, the series of Ming armada naval expeditions led by Admiral Hajji Mahmud Shams (aka Zheng He), a Muslim Chinese admiral, arrived in Java for several times, spanning the period from 1405 to 1433. By 1430, Zheng He’s expeditions has established Muslim Chinese and Arab communities in northern ports of Java, and thus Islam began to gain foothold on Java’s northern coast. “Admiral Hajji Mahmud Shams (aka Zheng He) was so frustrated when he first arrived in Java, because he could not find a single halal restaurant there”, so wrote Mah Huan, his scribe, thus deciding to spread Islam to the “barbarians” as Chinese records would write.
Also interesting to note is the following:
“In late Yuan Dynasty, China became chaotic, people who lived along the coastal area of Fujian, under the leadership of Ong Sum Ping’s siblings, escaped to eastern Kalimantan — they landed at the river mouth. When they were exhausted, facing a shipping crisis, someone lost their arms. After that, the Kadazans named it as Sungai Kinabatangan — the place where the Chinese lost their arms.
Ong Sum Ping and his sister, and the Chinese people developed the area of Sungai Kinabatangan, and they increased their influences there. With the increase of his prosperity, the natives named him Raja, or King. The Chinese named him as ‘Chung Ping’ – meaning the General. We can clearly see that Ong Sum Ping controlled Eastern Kalimantan.
This is Ong Sum Ping Rd in Brunei"
Ulasan:
Tak habis-habis dengan Parameswara yang dituduh pendatang.Eh apek,dahulu mana ada pasport.Suka hatilah nak pergi mana.Semenanjung dan Sumatera memang wilayah Melayu Srivijaya.Lainlah Lim Kit Siang.Asal-usul dari negeri China,lari ke negeri Melayu.
Sebab Zheng He tak jumpa restoran halal,dia jadi 'frust' kemudian ambil keputusan sebar Islam?Benak apa Komunis ini?Reka-reka cerita pula macam Encik Asree.
Lihat dia mengaku masa Dinasti Yuan (ini dinasti Monggol yang jajah China),keadaan di China porak poranda,maka Ong Sum Pin lari ke Borneo.Sekarang ini ada tak orang Cina Sabah Sarawak atau Brunei yang boleh 'trace' keturunannya sampai ke Ong Sum Pin ini?
Kalau tiada jangan cakap slupa anjing la apek.Manyak bising saja.Susahkan olang kili kanan.
Ok,kita ulas artikel kedua pula.Di sini:Lim Kit Siang2
Awal artikel disambung tentang peranan Om Sum Pin ini.Tak kiralah macam mana sekali pun tetapi Cina zaman Ong Sum Pin ini sudah pupus dan tak akan ubah sejarah bahawa Melayu adalah pribumi Brunei dan Cina adalah pendatang sahaja.
Petikan:
"Without Chinese help, Brunei and Sabah would have collapsed and fallen to the Muslim pirate Suluks. And the year is the early 1400s. And for the record, ‘Kina’ (kee-na) is used by Kadazan Dusun which similar to ‘Cina’ (chee-na) used by Malay which refer the Chinese. So, the correct way to say it in today’s context, is to call it CheenaBatangan, and Mount CheenaBalu, or Mount CheenaBaru (had they mispronounced it), and Kota CheenaBalu (to replace the British given name of Jesselton)."
Ulasan:
Wau,itula saya sudah bilang pada Encik Asree,orang luar tidak kira Cina atau orang Barat letak 'mark' pada Tausug adalah LANUN.Tapi Encik Asree degil.Mahu jugak hina orang Melayu.Siapa yang bagi orang Tausug duduk dalam negeri Melayu?Cina Komunis?Alfred Wallace?Melayu!
Seronok betul apek ini dengan nama-nama 'Kina' ini.Nak bagitahu orang Cina dah lama di Borneo sampai dinamakan tempat-tempat sempena nama kaum dia.Tetapi Kinabatangan atau Kinabalu bukan lesen untuk memadamkan 'title' pendatang.Sebab orang Kadazan dah beribu tahun duduk di Borneo.Cina dari negeri China.Kadazan duduk di Borneo.You understand,kids?
Kita petik lagi:
"This is the first clear record of the ‘Social Contract’. Both pendatangs would fight side by side to ward off other vicious attackers. Both pendatangs would help each other in times of need. And both pendatangs would intermarry, regardless of religion.
The second is that Maharaja Lela is a Chinese, and his name is General Ong Sum Ping. Now I ask you this: What is the significance of the title ‘Maharaja’? It contains the word ‘Maha’ followed by ‘Raja’. It is a title to mean ‘Most High King’. A title befitting a God and put together, it means “The God King, Lela”. The king of Thailand (Rama V, aka Chulalongkorn) also changed his name, from Dharma Raja to Dewa Raja)
Using one’s brains, one would easily deduce the following:
Firstly, the Sultan of Brunei was extremely so grateful that he elevated his Chinese brother-in-law to ‘God’ status.
Secondly, no Muslim is going to do that. ‘Maha’ anything is reserved for Allah. And to title his Chinese brother-in-law in this manner, whether Ong Sum Ping was a Muslim or not, is simply unthinkable had the Sultan really been a Muslim. Which again reinforces that Sultan Muhammad Shah was no Muslim.
Thirdly, Malaysia still has the title ‘Duli Yang Maha Mulia’ so I could be wrong about Muslims being able to call a human ‘Maha-something’ instead of the word reserved only for the divine."
Ulasan:
'Both pendatang?'Trauma betul Cina Komunis ini dengan 'title' pendatang.Saya lihat yang pendatang ni adalah Cina Ong Sum Ping.Sultan Brunei dan Melayu dah lama duduk Borneo.Asal saja Melayu...dari Palembang...ini skeptikal Orang Barat kepada orang Melayu.Padahal di semenanjung,di Borneo dah beribu tahun orang Melayu duduk disitu.Cuba tanya orang Brunei,awak ni Melayu dari Palembangkah?Sudah tentu anda akan dipandang 'slack' oleh mereka.Mereka Melayu Brunei.Saya tegaskan Melayu Brunei.Bukan dari Palembang.
Bingungnya si Komunis ini dengan istilah 'maharaja'.
Maharaja bermaksud 'Great King'.Raja Besar dalam istilah lainnya.Ini istilah biasa.Bukan nak kata Ong Sum Ping itu 'God'.Benak...benak.
Maharaja Lela itu bukan maksud maharaja yang memerintah.Maharaja Lela adalah satu gelaran biasa untuk pembesar raja.Kerajaan Perak juga pakai gelaran ini.Cuba baca sejarah Pasir Salak.Maharaja Lela yang berkomplot bunuh J.W.W Birch itu,Raja Perak kah???
Sejarah SPM fail kot.Dah la bodoh.Sombong pulak.Tamak lagi.Lastly merepek macam orang gila.
Ok,yang terakhir dari repekan tidak berpelajaran Komunis Malaysia:
"And the best of course, is reserved for last:
“In fact according to Chinese records of the Liang Dynasty, Tang Dynasty and Song Dynasty, Brunei had been sending her envoys to China and had also been receiving envoys from China. The earliest records stated that in the years 517AD, 521AD and 631AD, Brunei had sent her envoys to China. In 977AD, China sent her envoys to Brunei.” (see The Brunei Times)
The above sends a clear message that someone else was already King in Brunei circa 876 years before Sultan Muhammad Shah declared himself as Sultan. It is also very clear that the Chinese were already in Brunei 53 years before the Prophet Muhammad was born.
Also important to note, that the Chinese arrived at least 876 years before Parameswara reached Malacca. Could the Chinese have been the original royal lineage of Brunei? Remember that by the Year 53-Before-Prophet Muhammad, Chinese had already been living in Borneo. And never forget that the earliest Arabic maps label Malaya as ‘Barr Chin’ to mean Land of the Chinese.
And even earlier is this:
Second half of the 5th century: The Buddhist monk Hui-Shen and his Afghan companions travelled from China to Fu-Sang. Yes, the Afghans were Buddhists and carved the Bamiyan Buddhas that were destroyed by the Taliban.
Hui Sen visits Holotan (Java), on his way back to China. And the King of Java then sends seven missions to China begging them to recognize his kingdom, because no one else recognized them. This brings up strange questions. The Javanese kings did it, the Sultan of Brunei did it, and even Parameswars did it. Why were all these kings sucking up to the Chinese over the centuries? Is this what Ketuanan really means? Sucking up to China? All the Austronesians have certainly done it for the past 1,600 years, or more…
Final parting thoughts… Why are the oldest mosques in Malacca shaped all like Pagodas (in Trengkera)?
Why is there no ‘local’-shaped mosque architecture in Malacca? Why is there Bukit Cheena in Malacca, but no Bukit Melayu or more importantly, no Bukit Sultan? Why is there zero trace of any grave belonging to the Sultan of Malacca? Before anyone gives his lame excuse, there are at least 15 royal graves here in Brunei. All intact, all complete, and no missing links.
There are all records ranging from the Chinese (the later ones were Muslims) being in Borneo right from the fifth century right up till the 15th century. So the next time someone tells you that the Chinese only arrived in the 19th century …"
Ulasan:
Memanglah ada raja Melayu Brunei yang hantar duta ke Cina sebelum era Kesultanan Brunei.Orang Cina pun catat ada kerajaan purba bernama Po-ni.Apa nak hairan?Masalahnya si John Samdol ini terperangkap dengan Sultan-sultan dan pada fikirannya:Sultan=Melayu.Sebelum naik sultan pertama Brunei,raja Brunei orang Cina atau kaum lain.Stupid kiasu!
Perenggan yang ada perkataan 'Barr Chin' itu semuanya pembohongan Micheal Chick.Sebab itu saya rasa John Doe dan Micheal Chick ini kemungkinan orang yang sama.saya sudah jelaskan pembohongan 'Barr Chin' pada artikel lepas.
Kerajaan-kerajaan Nusantara hantar duta ke China sebab nak jalin hubungan diplomatik dan atas urusan perdagangan.Nak harap Maharaja China?Semua maklum dinasti-dinasti China AMALKAN DASAR TUTUP PINTU SEHINGGALAH KEDATANGAN IMPERIALIS EROPAH terutama era Perang Candu.Orang Austronesia memang suka amalkan semangat kejiranan.Bertanya khabar.Maharaja Cina TUTUP PINTU,orang Melayu datanglah ketuk pintu.Bukan macam Lim Kit Siang.Bina banglo atas bukit,membesarkan cina totok masing-masing.Bila mati,nak jugak jirat atas bukit.Bertanya khabar cuma nak jual barang saja.Selain itu...haram!
Bentuk bumbung masjid Melaka bukan pengaruh Cina.Ia pengaruh Melayu Segenting Kra.Lihat Masjid Kampung Laut macam mana.Sejarah Wali Songo ada kaitan dengan Champa-Kelantan.Lihat Masjid Agung Demak macam mana.
Tiada nama bukit-bukit dengan nama 'Bukit Melayu'?Tidak perlulah sebab seluruh semenanjung ini diberi nama Tanah Melayu dengan Bukit Cina itu dalam jajahan Tanah Melayu.Ada faham? :D
Ya...Cina generasi baru ini hanya datang ketika abad ke-19.Ini gelombang besar-besaran dengan faktor tolakan dan tarikan:
Tolakan:
Huru-hara di negeri China,kekacauan,kemiskinan,kebuluran.
Tarikan:
Kekayaan negeri-negeri Melayu.Aman damai,Galakan dari British untuk mengangkut ramai imigran Cina untuk memajukan industri.
P/S:Kenapa John Doe berusaha nak lawan BTN dengan memanipulasikan sejarah Brunei?Sebab di Malaysia tiada bukti Cina datang awalkah?Cari punya cari di Internet tak jumpa,akhirnya terpaksa pakai sejarah Brunei nak lawan Ketuanan UMNO.Lawak...lawak.
KESIMPULAN
Sejarah tidak boleh diubah atau diputarbelit.Pendatang tetap pendatang.Janganlah sedih.Kalau you tetap bersikap menyakiti hati orang Melayu dan terbawa-bawa dengan faham komunis you,get out from here!
Di sini hanya terima orang Cina yang mengamalkan ajaran Tao dan Konfusius yang berkasih sayang sesama insan dan menghormati orang-orang Melayu.Ini BARULAH BUKAN PENDATANG.INI KAWAN MAAA...
;D
~Srikandi
(Srikandi telah mewujudkan laman khas untuk menjawab persoalan sejarah atau kes-kes putarbelit sejarah.Sila ke halamansrikandi.Blog RiwayatMelayu hanya untuk artikel formal dalam siri Alter Terahsia Bangsa Melayu,harap maklum)
Kali ini saya tidak mahu berbasa-basi.Tidak mahu meleret-leret.Straight to the point.Ok.
Kali ini kita ulas blog seorang ahli politik Ultrakiasu berfahaman Komunis yang dikenali ramai.Jika mahu berurusan dengan Ultrakiasu,apa jua kajian sejarah Malaysia mereka tentang 'ketuanan Cina' di Malaysia,itu bukanlah lesen besar mereka untuk menuntut Malaysia dari tangan orang Melayu semutlaknya.Dari 'Ketuanan UMNO' itu cerita lain.Tapi bukan dari tangan orang Melayu semutlaknya.Kena faham itu.Ada beza di situ.
Blognya kali ini 'copy-paste' daripada artikel oleh John Doe,penulis yang mempunyai gaya yang sama dengan Micheal Chick,seorang lagi penulis kegemaran DAP,parti Chauvinist-Communist Malaysia.PAS kena sedar hal ini.Kena langkah mayat si Kauvinis-Komunis ini kalau nak tegak negara Islam.Kalau nak lawan UMNO,PAS kena bercerai dari DAP.Biar DAP berjuang sorang-sorang.Biar hidup segan mati tak mahu macam dulu-dulu.Menukarkan 'Ketuanan Melayu' kepada 'Ketuanan Islam' adalah lebih mudah daripada jika DAP naik memerintah,dia akan paksakan 'Malaysian Malaysia'.Ia bermaksud "ketuanan Cina berasaskan materialisme tahap berat' macam di Singapura.Ini bukan lagi nak bincang pasal 'sekularisme' tuan-tuan dan puan-puan.Ini adalah KAUVINIS-KOMUNIS.Tuhan mereka wang.Mereka 'kafir harbi' versi baru yang tak berperang dengan pedang.Mereka berperang dengan propaganda dan pilihanraya.Tipu muslihat.
Jadi PAS kena keluar sepenuhnya dari kerjasama dengan DAP.Biar sekularisme UMNO belasah habis-habis semua komunis ini.Kemudian PAS datang dakwah pada UMNO tentang sunnah Rasulullah s.a.w.Lama-lama lembutlah hati UMNO.Melembutkan hati sekularis Melayu yang mengucap dua kalimah syahadah dan sembahyang,lebih mudah rasanya dari melembutkan kafir harbi yang pekat dengan faham Komunis dan Kauvinisnya.Apa pemimpin UMNO kata semasa nak jalankan hukum hudud?"Ala...takut nanti semua orang Malaysia tak boleh kerja pasal kudung tangan...." atau "takut-takut nanti habis batu-batu tepi jalan semua pakai nak rejam orang berzina.."
Cakap berlapik-lapik sambil tersengih-sengih.
Tapi apa DAP Komunis cakap tentang hukum hudud?
LANGKAH MAYAT SAYA DULU! (Karpal Singh)
Tegas dan keras.Ini hukum Tuhan syeikh...you masih nak berkoloborasi dengan orang yang cabar hukum Allah macam tu sekali.Nak cabar langkah mayat dahulu konon.Kita tengok,sama ada Karpal Singh mati dulu atau HUKUM ALLAH mati dulu.Bukan sahaja Anwar harus bertaubat...Karpal Singh juga harus bertaubat sama.
:D
Sejarah tidak pernah berbohong.Cara yang digunakan oleh mereka ialah membuat keraguan terhadap sejarah orang Melayu,dengan membesar-besarkan sejarah kedatangan orang Cina walaupun Cina Muslim (etnik Hui,yang kadangkala didiskriminasi oleh Komunis China) dengan motif bahawa Cina memainkan peranan yang amat besar di Malaysia disamping merendahkan-rendahkan sejarah orang Melayu.Tidak kira betapa besar pun peranan yang dimainkan,'pendatang tetap pendatang' kecuali mereka membuang sifat Cina totok mereka,keangkuhan dan yang paling penting sifat 'ULTRAKIASU' mereka iaitu 'sindrom takut dikatakan pendatang'.
Ini artikel pertama:Lim Kit Siang1
Petikan pertama:
"Read the above again very carefully !! Sultan Muhammad Shah married a Johorean-Temasik princess in 1363. Now, for all those products of Biro Tata Negara (BTN) out there, what year was Malacca formed? 1403. So, there was a Johor king already in 1363? Are you going to argue with Ketuanan Brunei on this? (By the way, he’s more Melayu than YOU!) Also for those who insist that Penang be handed over to Kedah, read the following again and again …"
Jawapan:
Siapa Biro Tatanegara?Puak UMNO bukan faham sejarah pun.Kata Ketuanan Melayu konon,tapi tender-tender bagi kat Cina pasal kontraktor Cina suap duit.Ada seorang tukang buat longkang Melayu yang cuba nak mohon tender dalam UIA.Tapi apa yang orang Melayu dalam UIA tu buat?Bukan takat bos,kerani cabuk yang cuma bagi borang pada tukang Melayu ini pun mintak 50 sen satu kaki.You all tahu betapa susahnya usahawan Melayu nak survive pasal semua atasan Melayu ni main rasuah.Buat 100 institusi macam MARA pun tak jalan syeikh...kalau biawak-biawak pasir kat jabatan-jabatan kerajaan itu semua hidup mengemis duit suap Cina.Ingat lagi tak Zul eletronik yang pakar dalam bidang inovasi elektronik itu?Punya susah dia nak mintak tapak untuk memulakan perniagaan.Encik Zul ini bukan berada di Beijing.Dia orang Melayu yang nak berniaga di negara Ketuanan Melayu!
Cubala bagi tapak berniaga macam kedai elektronik di Jalan Pasar tu.Dah tentu Encik Zul boleh tolong bantu siapkan 'final project' anak-anak Melayu sambil mengajar.All out!Jual 'spare part' elektronik.Encik Zul boleh ambil budak-budak universiti ini buat R&D.Buat produk baru...pasarkan.
Jadi beralih kepada petikan tadi,siapa nak hairan dengan seorang "a Johorean-Temasik princess in 1363".Kita ada dua hujah pemusnah:
1)Kerajaan Temasek memang ada sebelum penubuhan Melaka.Kalau puteri itu dari 'Johorean-Temasek',tiada apa yang perlu dihairankan.Tiada kaitan dengan Melaka.
2)Tahun 1403 itu dah expired.Sekarang penubuhan Melaka seawal tahun 1262 Masehi.
Pulau Pinang patut serah pada Kedah balik pasal pengunduran British bermakna wilayah-wilayah kita yang dahulunya dijajah mereka sudah JADI HAKMILIK KITA SEPENUHNYA.Segala perjanjian bodoh Sultan-sultan dahulu boleh dibakar hangus.Apa nak takut dengan British?Dia orang sudah berambus pergi.So what?
Petikan lagi:
"The Johor ruler was under the Thais. The entire Peninsular belonged to the Thais! The ‘king’ of Singapore (Temasik), whom Parameswara of the Malaccan Sultanate murdered in cold blood was in fact the brother-in-Law of the ‘King’ of Pattani, who was under Ayodthaya rule. For those who do not know, Ayodthaya is in Thailand. And that, my friend was already well established before 1363.
Next, Kota Gelanggi was also another Thai City, (yet to be publicized). And why not? Because it is a Thai Buddhist kingdom. Yes, it’s along the Johor River. All I’m allowed to say at this point is that Kota Gelanggi is REALLY along the Johor River. Expose Kota Gelanggi, and you will find its 30ft Buddha statues and its many Buddhist Temples, in all it’s glory"
Ulasan:
Pemerintah Johor dibawah Thai?Apa yang komunis ini merapu?Bila masa pulak orang Thai terhegeh-hegeh sampai ke Johor?Kalau sampai ke Kedah itu bolehlah dipercayai.Bahkan sampai di Selangor dan Kuala Lumpur pun tak pernah dengar lagi,masakan pula tiba-tiba muncul orang Thai di Johor?Pelik...
Seluruh semenanjung di bawah Thai?INI LA BODOH SEJARAH NAMANYA.Bukan buta sejarah lagi.What the hell?Owh...Temagi?Dia wakil kerajaan Tambralingga/Sri Dharmaraja,BUKAN THAI.Sri Dharmaraja adalah 'Malay city-states'.Selepas membebaskan diri dari Srivijaya,Sri Dharmaraja menguasai seluruh semenanjung sehingga ke Temasik.Sebab sekarang Sri Dharmaraja (orang barat memanggilnya sebagai Ligor) di dalam Thailand sekarang,maka sejarahnya jadi hakmilik Thailand dan orang Thai?What the pathetic of this communist?!Sejarah tetap sejarah.You tak boleh tukar-tukar macam you tukar baju.
Ayuthaya tertubuh tahun 1351,peristiwa di atas tahun 1363,dalam masa 12 tahun sahaja tiba-tiba seluruh Tanah Melayu bawah Thai?My friend...Ayuthaya kena berperang dengan Sukothai dahulu,kerajaan Angkor dan Sri Dharmaraja.Tiada dalam sejarah Thai yang mengatakan mereka pernah menakluk sampai ke Johor.Wilayah mereka sampai ke Patani sahaja,itu pun berjaya setelah beberapa kali berperang dan sepenuhnya jatuh pada tahun 1771.Kenapa Melaka boleh jadi satu kesultanan besar di dalam wilayah Thai?Kemudian bila Melaka jatuh,senang-senang kerabat Sultan buka negeri Johor pula malah jadi empayar besar.Dalam wilayah Thai tu cek...tak marah ke raja Thai,bila dalam kerajaannya boleh pula orang Melayu buat kerajaan sendiri malah jadi empayar besar pula?
Masa mula-mula Ayutthaya tertubuh,Raja U-Thong ambil masa nak bangunkan Ayutthaya yang berpaya.Rakyatnya hanya para pengikutnya yang berhijrah bersamanya dari tengah Thailand.Masa tu kerajaan Sukothai paling kuat.Sebelah timur masih ada lagi kerajaan Angkor di Kemboja.Ambil masa la apek oiii....
Kota Gelanggi bukan kota Thai.Ia milik Siam Asli.Siam Asli bermaksud penduduk asli negeri Siam iaitu Melayu dan Mon.Apa nak dihairan dengan patung Buddha,sebab sebelum kedatangan Islam,memang ada orang di sini yang menganut ajaran Buddha,malah empayar Sriwijaya itu pun pengembang ajaran Buddha Mahayana.Tok nenek moyang Lim Kit Siang pada zaman purba pun kemungkinan belajar bahasa Sanskrit dengan pendeta Melayu.Agama Buddha bukan bermakna 'Cina' macam Hindu=Tamil.Satu lagi penyakit penulis sejarah Ultrakiasu.Kalau Islam=Melayu.Buddha=Cina.Hindu=Tamil.Sebab itu penulisan sejarahnya merepek-repek.
Lagi:
"So, for Penang to go back to Kedah, ALL of the peninsula needs to go back to the Thais. Sarawak needs to go back to Brunei, Brunei needs to go back to Majapahit, Sabah needs to go back to the Philippines, and Parameswara needs to go back to Palembang, leaving the Orang Asli in charge all over again. (I find it ludicrous that the Orang Asli are disqualified as ‘Bumiputera’ although they have been here since 60,000 years ago) "
ulasan:
Patutlah berkokok pasal semenanjung dahulu bawah Thai...dia ni takut kalau Sultan Kedah tuntut Pulau Pinang serah kat Kedah.Habislah 'Singapura Kedua' in the making...
Mari analisis satu persatu...
1)Penang to go back to Kedah
Yes...memang Pulau Pinang milik Kedah.Selepas British berambus,Pulau Pinang bukan lagi milik British maka kita ada hak untuk kembalikan Pulau Pinang kepada Sultan Kedah.
2)ALL of the peninsula needs to go back to the Thais
Apa bodohnya apek ni?Orang Thai adalah imigran termuda Indochina dimana Melayu,Mon dan Khmer selain Pyu adalah etnik-etnik Indochina awal.Semua pakar sejarah tahu hal ini termasuk diakui oleh sejarahwan Thai.Itu baru INDOCHINA,apatah lagi JOHOR yang nun kat hujung tu.Indochina tak abis jejak lagi,tiba-tiba muncul orang Thai di Johor?Benak betul,kata orang kampung saya.
Thai bukan pribumi semenanjung macam Lim Kit Siang bukan pribumi semenanjung.Kalau benar Thai menjajah semenanjung...THAI LAH YANG PATUT KEMBALIKAN SELURUH SEGENTING KRA DAN SEMENANJUNG KEPADA MELAYU,Thailand Tengah kepada orang Mon dan selebihnya kepada Kemboja sebab dahulunya sebahagian wilayah-wilayah Thai sekarang di bawah Empayar Khmer.You understand?
3)Sarawak needs to go back to Brunei
Kes Sarawak dan Sabah,'special' sikit.Dalam sejarah,memang kedua-dua wilayah ini pernah di bawah Brunei TETAPI semasa undian untuk bersama Persekutuan Malaysia,rakyat di kedua-dua negeri ini majoriti mahu merdeka bersama Malaysia.So what?
TAMBAHAN PULA,dahulu tiada negara bernama Malaysia.Yang ada negeri-negeri Melayu.Brunei adalah salah satu negeri-negeri Melayu.KESIMPULANNYA SARAWAK DAN SABAH TETAP MILIK ORANG MELAYU BUKAN KOMUNIS CHIN PENG.
4)Brunei needs to go back to Majapahit
Apa benaknya apek ni?Kenapa pula Brunei nak kembali ke Majapahit?Lebih baik tulis "Brunei needs to go back to Srivijaya".Sebab Sriwijaya lebih awal dari Majapahit,juga pernah menguasai Brunei.
Satu lagi kebodohan apek ini,mana ada Majapahit kini?Yang ada Indonesia.Dahulu tiada negara nama Indonesia.Orang Brunei pun mati-mati tak mahu masuk negara Indonesia.Macam mana Brunei mahu kembali ke Majapahit.Tapi apek...you jangan lisau punyerr...ada cara.
Bawa negeri Brunei sekarang naik mesin masa ke zaman Hayam Wuruk. :P
5)Sabah needs to go back to the Philippines
Kenapa pula Sabah perlu balik ke Filipina?Mana ada Filipina dahulukala?Sedangkan Filipina pun dijajah bersilih ganti oleh Sepanyol dan Amerika,mana sempat buat empayar takluk Sabah.Kebodohan apa yang cuba ditampilkan apek ini?
Presiden Macapagal tuntut Sabah atas kapasiti sejarah Kesultanan Sulu.Ini baru betul.Tapi Macapagal pun salah.Kesultanan Sulu hanya berkuasa di Jolo dan sekitarnya sahaja.Sabah di bawah Kesultanan Sulu hanya khayalan,sebab ada Kesultanan Melayu lebih hebat dari Sulu,yang ada autoriti ke atas Sabah.Siapa?Kesultanan Brunei.
6)Parameswara needs to go back to Palembang, leaving the Orang Asli in charge all over again
Sampai tahap ini,tak payah menjawab dengan panjang lebar...you just say..
'Lim Kit Siang and John Doe needs to go back to China, leaving the Orang Melayu & Orang Asli in charge all over again'
Best tak ayat ni? ;D
Kita petik lagi:
"Next, the year 1363 is of great significance. Why? That was the year that the first Sultan of Brunei converted to Islam. And he immediately became the Ruler of Brunei? What was he before that? A fisherman? A carpenter? A farmer? What was Awang Alak Betatar in 1362? And what happened the following year when he became a Sultan? Is becoming a Muslim enough to justify becoming a Sultan? Was he the first person in Brunei to convert to Islam?
Let’s scroll back time by 100 years; the year is now 1264. A full hundred years BEFORE Awang Alak Betatar converted to Islam, and declared himself a Sultan. A trip to Bandar Seri Begawan is not complete unless one visits the Muslim graves at Rangas. Chuck your ‘pantang’ out the window if you want to enjoy this first-hand, and in real life. Amongst these tombstones is the one of a Chinese Muslim by the name of Pu Kung Chih-mu. He was buried there in 1264. He was a Muslim, buried in a Muslim grave! This is more than a hundred years earlier, before the ascension of Awang Alak Betatar as the ‘first’ Sultan of Brunei. Not only that, he is not the only Chinese Muslim there. I cross-checked against the Brunei Museum Journal of 1993, and found that this has been so well documented!! In fact, this grave had already been found since 1973. Whole communities of Chinese Muslims had already been living in Kampong Batu well before the 12th Century. It is clearly recorded in the 1973 Brunei Museum Journal, and was visited by professors from Japan and China. Pictures are on page 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12. Some are even in colour."
Ulasan:
Siapa Pu Kung Chih-mu?Raja China yang memerintah Brunei?Sudah tentu TIDAK.Tidak perlu nak hairan ada kubur Cina Muslim di Brunei.Sebab negeri-negeri Melayu kaya dengan hasil bumi sebab itu ramai orang Cina datang ke negeri-negeri Melayu.Termasuklah Cina Islam yang datang berdakwah.Tapi YANG PUNYA AUTORITI KE ATAS NEGERI-NEGERI MELAYU ADALAH ORANG MELAYU.
Melainkan ada kubur Maharaja China dan istananya di Brunei,baru orang respek.Ini takat pedagang dan pendakwah Cina,perkara biasalah apek.
Buat-buat terkejut pula apek seorang ini.
Petikan:
"So, here’s another nugget for BTN un-educators. The Chinese brought Islam to this region in 1264. Wait! That’s not even correct. It was even earlier, because, this Muslim Chinese died in 1264. He had lived a full life in Brunei before he died. And before anyone even thinks of contesting this, let me draw your attention to yet another well-established fact, and let’s see how early the Chinese arrived.
According to records – as in the ‘Notes on the Malay Archipelago and Malacca Compiled from Chinese Sources’ by WP Groeneveldt in 1880 – a Chinese Islamic trader arrived in Brunei in the 10th century. His name was P’u-lu-shieh. He was both a trader and a diplomat. SQ Fatimi writing in the Sociological Research Institute in Singapore in 1963 under an article entitled ‘Islam Comes to Malaysia’, P’u-lu-shieh name is akin to Abu al-Layth.
The Brunei King at that time was named ‘Hiang-ta’. The arrival of the diplomat-trader from China was greeted with great ceremony. If this is so, Islam actually arrived in Brunei in the year of 977."
Ulasan:
Baguslah Islam datang awal ke negeri-negeri Melayu.Tidak kiralah siapa yang bawa,orang Arab ke Parsi ke Cina ke...tiada masalah.Orang Arab bawa Islam ke negeri-negeri Melayu,adakah bukti 'Ketuanan Arab' ke atas Melayu?Sudah tentu tidak.Jadi saya tidak faham kenapa apek bodoh sejarah ini terlompat-lompat dengan orang Cina yang membawa agama Islam ke negeri Melayu.Lim Kit Siang dan John Doe ini bukan orang Islam pun...sepatutnya mereka mencontohi orang Cina yang memeluk Islam,meninggalkan agama nenek moyang yang menyembah patung-patung tak bernyawa hasil bikinan tangan sendiri.
Sebenarnya selain orang Cina Muslim,pedagang Arab juga cuba-cuba menyebarkan agama Islam.Dalam sejarah,bukan oran Cina sahaja yang berdagang dengan raja Melayu,orang Arab pun ada,Parsi pun ada.
Owh,dia nak bagitahu,orang Cina dah lama duduk Brunei.Tak patut tuduh mereka PENDATANG.Masalahnya generasi sekarang bukan generasi dahulu.Generasi sekarang yang cari sesuap nasi di sini dan Brunei adalah generasi yang lari dari kekacauan di China serta mahu mencari rezeki dengan tenang di seberang laut.Generasi dahulu sudah pupus sama ada terasimilasi dengan orang Melayu atau balik ke China.Orang Cina yang kahwin dengan kerabat Sultan Brunei itu pun,anak-anaknya diberi nama Awang dan menjadi 'Melayu'.So what?
'Hiang-ta' itu adalah nama panggilan orang Cina dalam catatan mereka,tidak boleh dijadikan bukti.Macam 'Se-li Ma-ha-la-sha' seorang raja Nusantara,sebenarnya bernama 'Seri Maharaja'.Itu slang Cina,lidah pendek susah nak sebut nama Melayu atau nama Sanskrit.Sekarang pun ramai Cina Malaysia lidah pendek cakap Melayu pun teruk pelatnya walaupun dah bertahun duduk Malaysia.
Lagi:
"If this is the year 977, and the Sultan’s name in the year 977 is Hiang-Ta, then how can Awang Alak Betatar be the ‘first’ Sultan of Brunei in 1363? For those with very bad logic (or timeline problems), the year 977 is 406 years older than 1363. And in the year 977, the Chinese were already sending Muslim ambassadors to Brunei. The real question should be, thus, who exactly was that ‘Hiang Ta’ who ruled Brunei in the year 977? An Iban? A Kadazan or a Chinese?
It gets even better. The MOST interesting thing was that the Brunei king’s delegation to China to return the emperor’s greetings was also headed by another Muslim official by the name of P’u A-li (Abu Ali).
Based on this fact alone, Abu Ali must have held an important position in the Brunei government if he was tasked to be Brunei’s ambassador in those days. This is again, irrefutable proof that there was already a government, with a King, and some members of his royal court were Muslims. Again, this is proof that Islam had already reached Brunei before the year 977. This is 75 years into the beginning of the Soong Dynasty, and only severely retarded people will say that Abu Ali was an Arab because of his name"
Ulasan:
Lepas itu nak cakap Abu Ali itu Cina?Lagilah tak logik.
Tidak kisahlah AWang Alak Betatar ke sultan pertama,Hiang-ta ke sultan pertama,YANG PASTI BUKAN CINA KOMUNIS yang pertama jadi Sultan Brunei.Yang PASTINYA ORANG MELAYU PRIBUMI BRUNEI.
Boleh tanya lagi sama ada Iban,Cina atau Kadazan si Hiang-ta itu?Antara ketiga-tiga kaum itu di Brunei,siapa yang dikenali kerana Islam dan punya Kesultanan Islam dalam sejarah Brunei???
JAWAPANNYA TIDAK ADA.
Kesemua kaum-kaum itu majoriti non-muslim.Yang ada autoriti ke atas Kesultanan Islam ialah MELAYU BRUNEI.
Lagi:
"And by the way, Malacca was not to have been discovered for another 400 years. Is there a prawn under the stone? You can bet your bottom dollar (because Ringgit is worthless toilet paper) that whenever John Doe writes, there is.
A number of European historians claimed that Brunei was still not a Muslim nation until the 15th century. However, the Ming Shih, Book 325, a Chinese reference book noted that the King of Brunei in 1370 was Ma-ho-mo-sa. Some say that this should be read as Mahmud Shah. In fact, local Brunei historians prefer to take this to refer to Muhammad Shah, the first Sultan of Brunei.
Robert Nicholl, a former Brunei Museum curator argued in another paper entitled ‘Notes on Some Controversial Issues in Brunei History’ in 1980 that the name Ma-ho-mo-sa could be pronounced as Maha Moksha which means ‘Great Eternity’. ‘Maha Mokhsa’ would make it a Buddhist name. Nicholl goes on to argue that even the Brunei Sultan who died in Nanjing in 1408 was not a Muslim. (History books always detail that the Sultan of Brunei went to China, but few will state that he died there),
Another historian Paul Pelliot said Ma-na-jo-kia-nai-nai was reconstituted as Maharajah Gyana (nai). But the closest title would have been Maharaja Karna. However Brunei historians have insisted that the King was Sultan Abdul Majid Hassan, who would have been the second Sultan of Brunei.
Nicholl further argued that Sultan Muhammad Shah converted to Islam as late as the 16th century and not during the 14th century as is widely known. However according to Brunei historians, Sultan Muhammad Shah converted to Islam in 1363 and that he ruled until 1402. After which time, it was Sultan Abdul Majid Hassan, who died in China who ascended the throne. That was when Sultan Ahmad reigned in Brunei beginning 1406.
And why did I bring up this detail? Simple !! Read the top all over again:
-Sultan Muhammad Shah married a Johorean-Temasik Princess in 1363.
-And that Kota Gelanggi and the entire peninsular Malaya belonged to the Thais. And if this is true and correct, then both the Sultan of Brunei and his wife, would have been Buddhists.
-In fact, the entire peninsular Malaya had been Buddhist and/or Hindu ever since the second century when Lembah Bujang was built. And since this is the year 1363, all of Brunei and Borneo was also under the rule of King Hayam Wuruk, who was King of the Majapahit empire. And what religion did they have? (I’ll give you a hint… they built the Borobudor. And for those who claim that Borobudor is a mosque in disguise, please learn to recognize temple architecture.)
Borrobudor in all its splendour."
Ulasan:
Lihat,Cina pendek lidah sebut 'Mahmud Syah' jadi 'Ma-ho-mo-sa'.Bukti diberi sendiri oleh penulis Komunis.
Apa halnya dengan Maha Moksha?Aha...nak tahu kenapa?Kita lihat apa propaganda apek Komunis ini seterusnya,sampai tahap ini dia mula memutarbelitkan fakta sejarah 360 darjah,dengan andaian bahawa sebenarnya Sultan-sultan Brunei itu adalah penganut Buddha!
Kita analisis satu persatu:
1)Sultan Muhammad Shah married a Johorean-Temasik Princess in 1363.
Tiada Masalah.
2)And that Kota Gelanggi and the entire peninsular Malaya belonged to the Thais. And if this is true and correct, then both the Sultan of Brunei and his wife, would have been Buddhists.
Ini masalah.Thai tak pernah jajah SELURUH SEMENANJUNG.Kalau semenanjung di bawah Thai sekalipun APA KENA MENGENA DENGAN SULTAN BRUNEI NUN JAUH KAT BORNEO ITU?Baik tulis bahawa Borneo di bawah Thai terus.Hello,apek...you tau ka Borneo kat mana?Borneo bukan cantum dengan semenanjung la.Tarak baca ka?
3)In fact, the entire peninsular Malaya had been Buddhist and/or Hindu ever since the second century when Lembah Bujang was built. And since this is the year 1363, all of Brunei and Borneo was also under the rule of King Hayam Wuruk, who was King of the Majapahit empire. And what religion did they have? (I’ll give you a hint… they built the Borobudor. And for those who claim that Borobudor is a mosque in disguise, please learn to recognize temple architecture.)
Inilah dia bukti kebodohan sejarah yang pelik.BOROBUDUR BUKAN DIBINA ZAMAN MAJAPAHIT.IA DIBINA ERA SRIVIJAYA.What a pathetic bullshit of you??
Kalau saya jadi diktator...saya pancung saja apek Komunis ni.Menyusahkan.Merepek-repek.Buang masa.
Lihat,
"...And for those who claim that Borobudor is a mosque in disguise, please learn to recognize temple architecture."
Wah...kalau dah kiasu...kiasu jugak,sampai dakwaan Megat Siam dan Anai-anai pun MENAKUTKAN CINA KOMUNIS INI.Lawak...lawak...baca juga John Doe ini blog KedahCyberSaiburi itu.
Petikan terakhir:
"Oh, and even more important is this:
“Sultan Abdul Majid Hassan whose proper name is Zein Ul-Abidin, frequented the near distant islands, that He called ‘Solook’ (Sulu) from 1402 to 1424. Marrying the daughter (Parmursuli) of the Sulu Tomaoi (chief) Baginda” – it means he had a Filipino wife.
Also important to note, that since this is 1363, Parameswara had not yet swum across Pirate-Bay to reach Temasik yet. Hence, the need to locate the earlier kingdoms which pre-date ‘His Royal Pendatangness’.
During the reign of Wikramawardhana, the series of Ming armada naval expeditions led by Admiral Hajji Mahmud Shams (aka Zheng He), a Muslim Chinese admiral, arrived in Java for several times, spanning the period from 1405 to 1433. By 1430, Zheng He’s expeditions has established Muslim Chinese and Arab communities in northern ports of Java, and thus Islam began to gain foothold on Java’s northern coast. “Admiral Hajji Mahmud Shams (aka Zheng He) was so frustrated when he first arrived in Java, because he could not find a single halal restaurant there”, so wrote Mah Huan, his scribe, thus deciding to spread Islam to the “barbarians” as Chinese records would write.
Also interesting to note is the following:
“In late Yuan Dynasty, China became chaotic, people who lived along the coastal area of Fujian, under the leadership of Ong Sum Ping’s siblings, escaped to eastern Kalimantan — they landed at the river mouth. When they were exhausted, facing a shipping crisis, someone lost their arms. After that, the Kadazans named it as Sungai Kinabatangan — the place where the Chinese lost their arms.
Ong Sum Ping and his sister, and the Chinese people developed the area of Sungai Kinabatangan, and they increased their influences there. With the increase of his prosperity, the natives named him Raja, or King. The Chinese named him as ‘Chung Ping’ – meaning the General. We can clearly see that Ong Sum Ping controlled Eastern Kalimantan.
This is Ong Sum Ping Rd in Brunei"
Ulasan:
Tak habis-habis dengan Parameswara yang dituduh pendatang.Eh apek,dahulu mana ada pasport.Suka hatilah nak pergi mana.Semenanjung dan Sumatera memang wilayah Melayu Srivijaya.Lainlah Lim Kit Siang.Asal-usul dari negeri China,lari ke negeri Melayu.
Sebab Zheng He tak jumpa restoran halal,dia jadi 'frust' kemudian ambil keputusan sebar Islam?Benak apa Komunis ini?Reka-reka cerita pula macam Encik Asree.
Lihat dia mengaku masa Dinasti Yuan (ini dinasti Monggol yang jajah China),keadaan di China porak poranda,maka Ong Sum Pin lari ke Borneo.Sekarang ini ada tak orang Cina Sabah Sarawak atau Brunei yang boleh 'trace' keturunannya sampai ke Ong Sum Pin ini?
Kalau tiada jangan cakap slupa anjing la apek.Manyak bising saja.Susahkan olang kili kanan.
Ok,kita ulas artikel kedua pula.Di sini:Lim Kit Siang2
Awal artikel disambung tentang peranan Om Sum Pin ini.Tak kiralah macam mana sekali pun tetapi Cina zaman Ong Sum Pin ini sudah pupus dan tak akan ubah sejarah bahawa Melayu adalah pribumi Brunei dan Cina adalah pendatang sahaja.
Petikan:
"Without Chinese help, Brunei and Sabah would have collapsed and fallen to the Muslim pirate Suluks. And the year is the early 1400s. And for the record, ‘Kina’ (kee-na) is used by Kadazan Dusun which similar to ‘Cina’ (chee-na) used by Malay which refer the Chinese. So, the correct way to say it in today’s context, is to call it CheenaBatangan, and Mount CheenaBalu, or Mount CheenaBaru (had they mispronounced it), and Kota CheenaBalu (to replace the British given name of Jesselton)."
Ulasan:
Wau,itula saya sudah bilang pada Encik Asree,orang luar tidak kira Cina atau orang Barat letak 'mark' pada Tausug adalah LANUN.Tapi Encik Asree degil.Mahu jugak hina orang Melayu.Siapa yang bagi orang Tausug duduk dalam negeri Melayu?Cina Komunis?Alfred Wallace?Melayu!
Seronok betul apek ini dengan nama-nama 'Kina' ini.Nak bagitahu orang Cina dah lama di Borneo sampai dinamakan tempat-tempat sempena nama kaum dia.Tetapi Kinabatangan atau Kinabalu bukan lesen untuk memadamkan 'title' pendatang.Sebab orang Kadazan dah beribu tahun duduk di Borneo.Cina dari negeri China.Kadazan duduk di Borneo.You understand,kids?
Kita petik lagi:
"This is the first clear record of the ‘Social Contract’. Both pendatangs would fight side by side to ward off other vicious attackers. Both pendatangs would help each other in times of need. And both pendatangs would intermarry, regardless of religion.
The second is that Maharaja Lela is a Chinese, and his name is General Ong Sum Ping. Now I ask you this: What is the significance of the title ‘Maharaja’? It contains the word ‘Maha’ followed by ‘Raja’. It is a title to mean ‘Most High King’. A title befitting a God and put together, it means “The God King, Lela”. The king of Thailand (Rama V, aka Chulalongkorn) also changed his name, from Dharma Raja to Dewa Raja)
Using one’s brains, one would easily deduce the following:
Firstly, the Sultan of Brunei was extremely so grateful that he elevated his Chinese brother-in-law to ‘God’ status.
Secondly, no Muslim is going to do that. ‘Maha’ anything is reserved for Allah. And to title his Chinese brother-in-law in this manner, whether Ong Sum Ping was a Muslim or not, is simply unthinkable had the Sultan really been a Muslim. Which again reinforces that Sultan Muhammad Shah was no Muslim.
Thirdly, Malaysia still has the title ‘Duli Yang Maha Mulia’ so I could be wrong about Muslims being able to call a human ‘Maha-something’ instead of the word reserved only for the divine."
Ulasan:
'Both pendatang?'Trauma betul Cina Komunis ini dengan 'title' pendatang.Saya lihat yang pendatang ni adalah Cina Ong Sum Ping.Sultan Brunei dan Melayu dah lama duduk Borneo.Asal saja Melayu...dari Palembang...ini skeptikal Orang Barat kepada orang Melayu.Padahal di semenanjung,di Borneo dah beribu tahun orang Melayu duduk disitu.Cuba tanya orang Brunei,awak ni Melayu dari Palembangkah?Sudah tentu anda akan dipandang 'slack' oleh mereka.Mereka Melayu Brunei.Saya tegaskan Melayu Brunei.Bukan dari Palembang.
Bingungnya si Komunis ini dengan istilah 'maharaja'.
Maharaja bermaksud 'Great King'.Raja Besar dalam istilah lainnya.Ini istilah biasa.Bukan nak kata Ong Sum Ping itu 'God'.Benak...benak.
Maharaja Lela itu bukan maksud maharaja yang memerintah.Maharaja Lela adalah satu gelaran biasa untuk pembesar raja.Kerajaan Perak juga pakai gelaran ini.Cuba baca sejarah Pasir Salak.Maharaja Lela yang berkomplot bunuh J.W.W Birch itu,Raja Perak kah???
Sejarah SPM fail kot.Dah la bodoh.Sombong pulak.Tamak lagi.Lastly merepek macam orang gila.
Ok,yang terakhir dari repekan tidak berpelajaran Komunis Malaysia:
"And the best of course, is reserved for last:
“In fact according to Chinese records of the Liang Dynasty, Tang Dynasty and Song Dynasty, Brunei had been sending her envoys to China and had also been receiving envoys from China. The earliest records stated that in the years 517AD, 521AD and 631AD, Brunei had sent her envoys to China. In 977AD, China sent her envoys to Brunei.” (see The Brunei Times)
The above sends a clear message that someone else was already King in Brunei circa 876 years before Sultan Muhammad Shah declared himself as Sultan. It is also very clear that the Chinese were already in Brunei 53 years before the Prophet Muhammad was born.
Also important to note, that the Chinese arrived at least 876 years before Parameswara reached Malacca. Could the Chinese have been the original royal lineage of Brunei? Remember that by the Year 53-Before-Prophet Muhammad, Chinese had already been living in Borneo. And never forget that the earliest Arabic maps label Malaya as ‘Barr Chin’ to mean Land of the Chinese.
And even earlier is this:
Second half of the 5th century: The Buddhist monk Hui-Shen and his Afghan companions travelled from China to Fu-Sang. Yes, the Afghans were Buddhists and carved the Bamiyan Buddhas that were destroyed by the Taliban.
Hui Sen visits Holotan (Java), on his way back to China. And the King of Java then sends seven missions to China begging them to recognize his kingdom, because no one else recognized them. This brings up strange questions. The Javanese kings did it, the Sultan of Brunei did it, and even Parameswars did it. Why were all these kings sucking up to the Chinese over the centuries? Is this what Ketuanan really means? Sucking up to China? All the Austronesians have certainly done it for the past 1,600 years, or more…
Final parting thoughts… Why are the oldest mosques in Malacca shaped all like Pagodas (in Trengkera)?
Why is there no ‘local’-shaped mosque architecture in Malacca? Why is there Bukit Cheena in Malacca, but no Bukit Melayu or more importantly, no Bukit Sultan? Why is there zero trace of any grave belonging to the Sultan of Malacca? Before anyone gives his lame excuse, there are at least 15 royal graves here in Brunei. All intact, all complete, and no missing links.
There are all records ranging from the Chinese (the later ones were Muslims) being in Borneo right from the fifth century right up till the 15th century. So the next time someone tells you that the Chinese only arrived in the 19th century …"
Ulasan:
Memanglah ada raja Melayu Brunei yang hantar duta ke Cina sebelum era Kesultanan Brunei.Orang Cina pun catat ada kerajaan purba bernama Po-ni.Apa nak hairan?Masalahnya si John Samdol ini terperangkap dengan Sultan-sultan dan pada fikirannya:Sultan=Melayu.Sebelum naik sultan pertama Brunei,raja Brunei orang Cina atau kaum lain.Stupid kiasu!
Perenggan yang ada perkataan 'Barr Chin' itu semuanya pembohongan Micheal Chick.Sebab itu saya rasa John Doe dan Micheal Chick ini kemungkinan orang yang sama.saya sudah jelaskan pembohongan 'Barr Chin' pada artikel lepas.
Kerajaan-kerajaan Nusantara hantar duta ke China sebab nak jalin hubungan diplomatik dan atas urusan perdagangan.Nak harap Maharaja China?Semua maklum dinasti-dinasti China AMALKAN DASAR TUTUP PINTU SEHINGGALAH KEDATANGAN IMPERIALIS EROPAH terutama era Perang Candu.Orang Austronesia memang suka amalkan semangat kejiranan.Bertanya khabar.Maharaja Cina TUTUP PINTU,orang Melayu datanglah ketuk pintu.Bukan macam Lim Kit Siang.Bina banglo atas bukit,membesarkan cina totok masing-masing.Bila mati,nak jugak jirat atas bukit.Bertanya khabar cuma nak jual barang saja.Selain itu...haram!
Bentuk bumbung masjid Melaka bukan pengaruh Cina.Ia pengaruh Melayu Segenting Kra.Lihat Masjid Kampung Laut macam mana.Sejarah Wali Songo ada kaitan dengan Champa-Kelantan.Lihat Masjid Agung Demak macam mana.
Tiada nama bukit-bukit dengan nama 'Bukit Melayu'?Tidak perlulah sebab seluruh semenanjung ini diberi nama Tanah Melayu dengan Bukit Cina itu dalam jajahan Tanah Melayu.Ada faham? :D
Ya...Cina generasi baru ini hanya datang ketika abad ke-19.Ini gelombang besar-besaran dengan faktor tolakan dan tarikan:
Tolakan:
Huru-hara di negeri China,kekacauan,kemiskinan,kebuluran.
Tarikan:
Kekayaan negeri-negeri Melayu.Aman damai,Galakan dari British untuk mengangkut ramai imigran Cina untuk memajukan industri.
P/S:Kenapa John Doe berusaha nak lawan BTN dengan memanipulasikan sejarah Brunei?Sebab di Malaysia tiada bukti Cina datang awalkah?Cari punya cari di Internet tak jumpa,akhirnya terpaksa pakai sejarah Brunei nak lawan Ketuanan UMNO.Lawak...lawak.
KESIMPULAN
Sejarah tidak boleh diubah atau diputarbelit.Pendatang tetap pendatang.Janganlah sedih.Kalau you tetap bersikap menyakiti hati orang Melayu dan terbawa-bawa dengan faham komunis you,get out from here!
Di sini hanya terima orang Cina yang mengamalkan ajaran Tao dan Konfusius yang berkasih sayang sesama insan dan menghormati orang-orang Melayu.Ini BARULAH BUKAN PENDATANG.INI KAWAN MAAA...
;D
~Srikandi
(Srikandi telah mewujudkan laman khas untuk menjawab persoalan sejarah atau kes-kes putarbelit sejarah.Sila ke halamansrikandi.Blog RiwayatMelayu hanya untuk artikel formal dalam siri Alter Terahsia Bangsa Melayu,harap maklum)
.jpg)
